Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Losing Left – Why Stack Size (and thereby Tournament vs. Cash) Matters

Last week I introduced my “new” rule about playing weak hands out of position in online tournaments. Basically my theory is based on the fact that I can wait out these situations and hope for either a) a better hand later, or b) a passive opponent that assists me to a showdown cheaply. I also relied heavily on the fact that blinds chop away at a stack quickly in a tournament.

This week I want to talk about the exception that makes the rule. What happens when I have 10,000 chips and the blinds are 25/50 for the next 15 minutes online, or 40 minutes in a brick and mortar? Am I going to play this situation the same way? Well, I will say that this will be my general rule for tournaments. However, the deeper the stack sizes are, the more I’m willing to make an exception. Also, reading the board can’t be dismissed. If there are draws out there, then a called bet by a positional player becomes weaker based on the chance that they are chasing a draw.

The definitive example of this exception comes in cash game play. While the game is technically “table stakes”, ultimately the amount of money that can be won is only limited by how many times players reach into their deep pockets. There is some money out there to be made in value with middle pair. While my intention is usually to keep the pot small, in a cash game, or a deep stack tournament, the best way to insure a small pot it to be sure to take control of the pot, which means taking the lead after the flop.

Here’s another example- top pair, mediocre kicker. But with a deeper stack (and as important my opponents had deep stacks), I was able to take control of the hand on the flop, and put it away on the turn when it became apparent I had the best hand.


*********** # 1 **************
PokerStars Game #39510252010: Tournament #241450085, $0.25+$0.00 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level IV (25/50) - 2010/02/09 19:32:10 PT [2010/02/09 22:32:10 ET]
Table '241450085 10' 9-max Seat #9 is the button

Seat 1: amour59 (1615 in chips)

Seat 2: horizon58 (2975 in chips)

Seat 3: shaydushane (6155 in chips)

Seat 4: CgCook38 (4910 in chips)

Seat 5: moneymaica (750 in chips) is sitting out

Seat 6: clingfree (2550 in chips)

Seat 7: lexxl19 (8900 in chips)

Seat 8: JimmiBlY (9540 in chips)

Seat 9: TJ1812 (6960 in chips)

amour59: posts small blind 25

horizon58: posts big blind 50

*** HOLE CARDS ***

Dealt to CgCook38 [Th Ah]

shaydushane: folds

CgCook38: calls 50

moneymaica: folds

clingfree: folds

lexxl19: folds

JimmiBlY: calls 50

TJ1812: folds

amour59: folds

horizon58: checks

*** FLOP *** [8s As 6d]

horizon58: checks

CgCook38: bets 100

JimmiBlY: calls 100

horizon58: calls 100

*** TURN *** [8s As 6d] [9c]

horizon58: checks

CgCook38: bets 350

JimmiBlY: folds

horizon58: folds

Uncalled bet (350) returned to CgCook38

CgCook38 collected 475 from pot

CgCook38: doesn't show hand

*** SUMMARY ***

Total pot 475 | Rake 0

Board [8s As 6d 9c]

Seat 1: amour59 (small blind) folded before Flop

Seat 2: horizon58 (big blind) folded on the Turn

Seat 3: shaydushane folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 4: CgCook38 collected (475)

Seat 5: moneymaica folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 6: clingfree folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 7: lexxl19 folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 8: JimmiBlY folded on the Turn

Seat 9: TJ1812 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)

No comments:

Post a Comment